References

Bianchi F, Booij CJH, Tscharntke T. Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: A review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control. In: Proc Royal Soc B-Biologic Sci. 2006. 273:1715-27. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3530 [CrossRef]

Brodt S, Klonsky K, Jackson L, et al. Factors affecting adoption of hedgerows and other biodiversity-enhancing features on farms in California, USA. Agroforest Syst. 2009. 76(1):195-206. DOI: 10.1007/s10457-008-9168-8 [CrossRef]

Bugg RL, Anderson JH, Thomsen CD, Chandler J. Pickett CH, Bugg RL. Farmscaping in California: Hedgerows, roadside plantings and wild plants for biointensive pest management. Enhancing Biological Control: Habitat Management to Promote Natural Enemies of Agricultural Pests 1998. Berkeley, CA:UC Pr. p. 339-74.

[CAFF] Community Alliance with Family Farmers. Hedgerows for California Agriculture: A Resource Guide 2004. p.70. caff.org/programs/bio-ag/hedgerows/

Corbett A, Rosenheim JA. Impact of a natural enemy overwintering refuge and its interaction with the surrounding landscape. Ecol Entomol. 1996. 21:155-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.1996.tb01182.x [CrossRef]

Dennis P, Thomas MB, Sotherton NW. Structural features of field boundaries which influence the overwintering densities of beneficial arthropod predators. J Appl Ecol. 1994. 31:361-70. DOI: 10.2307/2404550 [CrossRef]

Ehler LE. Farmscape Ecology of Stink Bugs in Northern California 2000. Lanham, MD:Entomol Soc Am. 59p.

Fiedler AK, Landis DA. Plant characteristics associated with natural enemy abundance at Michigan native plants. Environ Entomol. 2007. 36:878-86. DOI: 10.1603/0046-225X(2007)36[878:PCAWNE]2.0.CO;2 [CrossRef]

Griffiths GJK, Winder L, Holland JM, Thomas CFG. The representation and functional composition of carabid and staphylinid beetles in different field boundary types at a farm-scale. Biol Conserv. 2007. 135:145-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2006.09.016 [CrossRef]

Hannon LE, Sisk TD. Hedgerows in an agri-natural landscape: Potential habitat value for native bees. Biol Conserv. 2009. 142:2140-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.04.014 [CrossRef]

Hopwood JL. The contribution of roadside grassland restorations to native bee conservation. Biol Conserv. 2008. 141:2632-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.026 [CrossRef]

Kleijn D, Baquero RA, Clough Y, et al. Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol Lett. 2006. 9:243-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00869.x [CrossRef]

Kort J, Collins M, Ditsch D. A review of soil erosion potential associated with biomass crops. Biomass Bioenerg. 1998. 14:351-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0961-9534(97)10071-X [CrossRef]

Long RF, Anderson J. Establishing Hedgerows on Field Crop Farms in California's Central Valley 2010. p.7. UC ANR Pub 8390. Oakland, CA

Long RF, Corbett A, Lamb C, et al. Beneficial insects move from flowering plants to nearby crops. Cal Ag. 1998. 52(5):23-6. DOI: 10.3733/ca.v052n05p23 [CrossRef]

Mueller SC, Summers CG, Goodell PB. Composition of Lygus species found in selected agronomic crops and weeds in the San Joaquin Valley, California. Southwest Entomol. 2005. 30:121-7.

Pease CG, Zalom FG. Influence of non-crop plants on stink bug (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) and natural enemy abundance in tomatoes. J Appl Entomol. 2010. 134:626-36. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01452.x [CrossRef]

SAS. SAS System for Windows 1999. Cary, NC:SAS Institute.

Smith J, Potts SG, Woodcock BA, Eggleton P. Can arable field margins be managed to enhance their biodiversity, conservation and functional value for soil macro-fauna?. J Appl Ecol. 2008. 45:269-78. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01433.x [CrossRef]

Thomas CFG, Marshall EJP. Arthropod abundance and diversity in differently vegetated margins of arable fields. Agr Ecosyst Environ. 1999. 72:131-44. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-8809(98)00169-8 [CrossRef]

[UC IPM] University of California Integrated Pest Management. 2006. www.ipm.ucdavis.edu/PMG/r1900311.html