California Agriculture Online
California Agriculture Home  >   Volume 65   >   Number 4  >   Viewing Expanded Abstract

peer-reviewed research article

Forest and rangeland owners value land for natural amenities and as financial investment

authors

Michael DeLasaux, UC Cooperative Extension
Sabrina L. Drill, UC Cooperative Extension
Shasta Ferranto, UC Berkeley
Christy Getz, UC Berkeley
Lynn Huntsinger, UC Berkeley
Maggi Kelly, UC Berkeley
Gary M. Nakamura, UC Cooperative Extension
William C. Stewart, UC Cooperative Extension
Yana Valachovic, UC Cooperative Extension

publication information

California Agriculture 65(4):184-191. DOI: 10.3733/ca.v065n04p184. October-December 2011.

abstract

Forty-two percent of California's forests and rangelands are privately owned (34 million acres). These lands provide important ecosystem services such as carbon sequestration, pollination and wildlife habitat, but little is known about the people who own and manage them. We surveyed forest and rangeland owners in California and found that these long-time landowners value their properties for their natural amenities and as a financial investment. Owners of large properties (500 or more acres) were significantly more likely to use their land for income production than owners of smaller properties, and they were also more likely to carry out or be interested in environmental improvements. Many forest and rangeland owners reported they had been previously approached to sell their land for development. Only about one-third had participated in conservation programs; few had conservation easements. This survey can help guide outreach and education efforts, and the development of information, policies, programs and financial incentives for landowners.

author affiliations

M. DeLasaux is Natural Resources Advisor, UCCE Plumas-Sierra; S. Drill is Natural Resources Advisor, UCCE Los Angeles County; S. Ferranto is Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley; C. Getz is Associate Cooperative Extension Specialist, UC Berkeley; L. Huntsinger is Professor, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley;; M. Kelly is Cooperative Extension Specialist and Adjunct Professor, Department of Environmental Science, Policy and Management, UC Berkeley. G. Nakamura is UC Cooperative Extension (UCCE) Specialist, Shasta County (retired); W. Stewart is Cooperative Extension Specialist, UC Berkeley; Y. Valachovic is Forest Advisor and County Director, UCCE Del Norte County;

References

Alig RJ, Plantinga AJ. Future forestland area: Impacts from population growth and other factors that affect land values. J Forest. 2004. 102:19-24.

Brown DG, Johnson KM, Loveland TR, Theobald DM. Rural land-use trends in the conterminous United States, 1950–2000. Ecol Appl. 2005. 15:1851-63. DOI: 10.1890/03-5220 [CrossRef]

Butler BJ, Leatherberry EC. America's family forest owners. J Forest. 2004. 102:4-9.

Campos P, Oviedo JL, Caparros A, et al. Contingent valuation of woodland-owner private amenities in Spain, Portugal and California. Rangeland Ecol Ma nag. 2009. 62:240-52. DOI: 10.2111/08-178R2.1 [CrossRef]

[CDFFP] California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. The Changing California: Forest and Range 2003 Assessment 2003. Sacramento, CA. http://frap.cdf.ca.gov/assessment2003

Clendenning G, Field DR, Jensen D. A survey of seasonal and permanent landowners in Wisconsin's Northwoods: Following Dillman and then some. Soc Natur Resourl. 2004. 17:431-42. DOI: 10.1080/08941920490430223 [CrossRef]

Dillman DA. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method 2007. 2nd ed. New York:Wiley. 464p.

Gosnell H, Haggerty JH, Travis WR. Ranchland ownership change in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem, 1990–2001: Implications for conservation. Soc Natur Resour. 2006. 19:743-58. DOI: 10.1080/08941920600801181 [CrossRef]

Gustanski JA, Squires RH. Protecting the Land: Conservation Easements Past, Present and Future 2000. Washington, DC:Island Pr. 566p.

Hansen AJ, Knight R, Marzluff JM, et al. Effects of exurban development on biodiversity: Patterns, mechanisms and research needs. Ecol Appl. 2005. 15:1893-905. DOI: 10.1890/05-5221 [CrossRef]

Hobbs NT, Galvin KA, Stokes CJ, et al. Fragmentation of rangelands: Implications for humans, animals and landscapes. Global Env Chang. 2008. 18:776-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2008.07.011 [CrossRef]

Huntsinger L, Johnson M, Stafford M, Fried J. California hardwood rangeland landowners 1985 to 2004: Ecoystem services, production and permanence. Rangeland Ecol Ma nag. 2010. 63:325-34. DOI: 10.1021/es970420x [CrossRef]

Jones RE, Fly JM, Talley J, Cordell HK. Green migration into rural America: The new frontier of environmentalism. Soc Natur Resour. 2003. 16:221-38. DOI: 10.1080/08941920309159 [CrossRef]

Kendra A, Hull B. Motivations and behaviors of new forest owners in Virginia. Forest Sci. 2005. 51:142-54.

Kroll CA. California Housing in the Subprime/Credit Crisis — Overview and a Forward Look at Recovery 2009. UC Berkeley Fisher Center for Real Estate and Urban Economics. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/9h1898m1

Maestas JD, Knight RL, Gilgert WC. Biodiversity across a rural land-use gradient. Conserv Biol. 2003. 17:1425-34. DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.02371.x [CrossRef]

Maletta H. Weighting 2007. www.spsstools.net/Tutorials/WEIGHTING.pdf

Moritz MA, Stephens SL. Fire and sustainability: Considerations for California's altered future climate. Clim Change. 2008. 87:265-71. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-007-9361-1 [CrossRef]

Nowak DJ, Walton JT. Projected urban growth (2000–2050) and its estimated impact on the U.S. forest resource. J Forest. 2005. 103:383-9.

Parmenter AW, Hansen A, Kennedy RE, et al. Land use and land cover change in the greater Yellowstone ecosystem: 1975–1995. Ecol Appl. 2003. 13:687-703. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0687:LUALCC]2.0.CO;2 [CrossRef]

Sokolow A. Outlook: Budget cuts threaten the Williamson Act, California's longstanding farmland protection program. Cal Ag. 2010. 64:118-20. DOI: 10.3733/ca.v064n03p121 [CrossRef]

Theobald DM. Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecol Soc. 2005. 10:32-

Walker P, Fortmann L. Whose landscape? A political ecology of the “exurban” Sierra. Cult Geogr. 2003. 10:469-91. DOI: 10.1191/1474474003eu285oa [CrossRef]

White EM, Morzillo AT, Alig RJ. Past and projected rural land conversion in the U.S. at state, regional and national levels. Landscape Urban Plan. 2009. 89:37-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.09.004 [CrossRef]

Yung L, Belsky JM. Private property rights and community goods: Negotiating landowner cooperation amid changing ownership on the Rocky Mountain Front. Soc Natur Resour. 2007. 20:689-703. DOI: 10.1080/08941920701216586 [CrossRef]