Skip to Content Site Map
University of California Agriculture and Natural Resources
Agriculture and Natural Resources
  • Home
  • About us
    • What is ANR?
    • Strategic Vision
    • Diversity Matters
    • Giving to ANR
    • Retiree relations
    • For ANR Employees
    • Social networking
    • Comments and questions
  • Publications
    • ANR Catalog
    • Free ANR Publications
    • California Agriculture Journal
    • ANR Report
  • Offices
    • County offices
    • Administration
    • Statewide programs
    • Research and Extension Centers
    • News
    • Campus Resources
    • UC Berkeley College of Natural Resources
    • UC Davis College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences
    • UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine
    • UC Riverside College of Natural & Agricultural Sciences
    • UC system
  • 4-H
    • California 4-H Youth Development Program
    • 4-H policy handbook
  • Food
    • UC Food Blog
    • 'Nutrition Perspectives' Newsletter
    • Center for Consumer Research
    • Center for Weight and Health
    • FoodSafe Program
    • Maternal and Infant Nutrition
    • Seafood Network Information Center
  • Farm
    • Agricultural Issues Center
    • Agronomy Research and Information Center
    • Foundation Plant Services
    • Fruit and Nut Research and Information Center
    • Kearney Agricultural Center
    • Postharvest Technology Research and Information Center
    • Seed Biotechnology Center
    • Small farm program
    • Statewide IPM Project pest management guidelines
    • Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program
    • Vegetable Research and Information Center
  • Garden
    • ANR Gardening Publications
    • California Backyard Orchard
    • California Gardening
    • California Master Gardeners
    • Fruits and Nuts Research and Information Center
    • Ornamental Horticulture Research and Information Center
    • Pest Notes
  • Family
    • Youth, Family and Communities Statewide Program
    • Money Talks
    • Lifeskills newsletter
    • ANR 'PeopleLinks'
  • Environment
    • UC Green Blog
    • California Rangeland Research and Information Center
    • Center for Forestry
    • Hopland Research and Extension Center
    • Kearney Foundation of Soil Science
    • Renewable Resources Extension Act
    • Sierra Foothill Research and Extension Center
    • Sudden Oak Death
  • People
    • Academic Directory
    • People Search
  • Jobs
  • Español
UC Delivers Impact Story
Share Print
X
  • Facebook Icon Facebook
  • Twitter Icon Twitter
  • Google Icon Google Plus
  • Reddit Icon Reddit
  • Delicious Icon Delicious
  • LinkedIn Icon LinkedIn
  • StumbleUpon Icon StumbleUpon
  • Short URL:

Smaller picking tubs reduce back injury risk for einegrape pickers

View All Stories | Return to UC Delivers

The Issue

Smaller picking tubs reduce back injury risk for einegrape pickers
Carrying and filling tubs during winegrape harvest
Hand harvest work in winegrape vineyards is physically demanding and exposes workers to ergonomics risks. Back injuries are the most common and most costly. With some 230 back injuries reported annually, the cost to the California vineyard industry is more than $2.3 million per year. In addition to uncalculated worker pain and lost income, these injuries reduce productivity and drive up workers compensation insurance costs.

What has ANR done?

UC Cooperative Extension farm advisors, together with a research team led by CE specialist James Meyers and professor emeritus John Miles, reviewed multiple vineyard jobs for ergonomics risk exposures. They worked with three wineries and one vineyard management company, involving more than 200 workers. They found that hand harvest is the most physically demanding job in winegrape vineyard work. When filled, standard-sized tubs weighed an average of 57 pounds. (Some weighed in at more than 80 pounds.) Workers must stoop, grip, lift, carry and dump up to 20 times per hour, besides relocating the tub down the row.

Smaller plastic tubs were evaluated with workers during the 1997–1999 winegrape harvests and ergonomics assessment showed large reductions in risk exposures. Workers fill the small tubs in less time, which means they lift more frequently. They also make more carries per hour to deliver the same tonnage. However, due to the smaller tubs' lighter weight, there was actually a slight decrease in energy demand. The smaller tub does result in a 2.5 percent decrease in worker productivity as measured by pounds of grapes per shift. (This was not noted by either workers or managers, but by the researchers.)

The Payoff

Workers and managers both approve smaller tubs

The smaller picking tubs have resulted in a five-fold reduction in harvest workers' reported pain and symptoms for back injury and other musculoskeletal disorders. Workers are less tired and less likely to be injured using the smaller tubs. Equally important, the workers have accepted the use of the smaller tub. All of the vineyard companies cooperating in the project have permanently adopted the smaller picking tub. The tubs are commercially available and indications of worker preference suggest that they will be disseminated throughout vineyards in Napa and Sonoma counties.

Contact

Rhonda Smith, viticulture farm advisor, rhsmith@ucdavis.edu
James Meyers, agricultural environmental health specialist,jmmeyers@uclink4.berkeley.edu

  • Home
  • Calendar
  • Accessibility
  • Diversity Matters
  • Development services
  • News
  • Jobs
  • County offices
  • Statewide programs
  • UC system
  • Social networking
  • UC Delivers
    • Categories
    • Archives

Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California

© 2013 Regents of the University of California Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources Nondiscrimination Statement

Accessibility Get PDF Reader Get Flash Player Site Information